Tax Rebates Deal Announced in USA

General chitchat to your friends or just chat about life, news, events, sports or anything else that comes to mind. Try to keep this area free of any nudity and try to keep the language clean in this area.

Moderator: ACC-Staff

Forum rules
No XXX material in this area is allowed and try to keep the profanity to a minimum. This area is open to everyone.

Tax Rebates Deal Announced in USA

Postby DarkOne on Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:27 am

WASHINGTON (AP) - Congressional leaders announced a deal with the White House Thursday on an economic stimulus package that would give most tax filers refunds of $600 to $1,200, and more if they have children.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Congress would act on the agreement?hammered out in a week of intense negotiations and uncustomary bipartisanship?"at the earliest date, so that those rebate checks can be in the mail."

President Bush praised the agreement at the White House, saying it "has the right set of policies and is the right size."

The rebates, which would go to about 116 million families, had appeal for both Democrats and Republicans. Pelosi's staff noted that they would include $28 billion in checks to 35 million working families who wouldn't have been helped by Bush's original proposal. Republicans, for their part, were pleased that the bulk of the rebates?more than 70 percent, according to an analysis by Congress' Joint Tax Committee?would go to individuals who pay taxes.

Individuals who pay income taxes would get up to $600, working couples $1,200 and those with children an additional $300 per child under the agreement. Workers who make at least $3,000 but don't pay taxes would get $300 rebates.

The first rebate payments could begin going out in May, and most people could have them by July, said Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, noting that the IRS will already be overwhelmed processing 2007 tax returns. The rebates were expected to cost about $100 billion, and the package also includes close to $50 billion in business tax cuts.

The principal players in pulling the deal together were Pelosi, House Republican leader John Boehner and Paulson. The package would allow businesses to immediately write off 50 percent of purchases of plants and other capital equipment and permit small businesses to write off additional purchases of equipment. A GOP-written provision to allow businesses suffering losses now to reclaim taxes previously paid was dropped.

Pelosi, D-Calif., agreed to drop increases in food stamp and unemployment benefits during a Wednesday meeting in exchange for gaining the rebates of at least $300 for almost everyone earning a paycheck, including those who make too little to pay income taxes.

"I can't say that I'm totally pleased with the package, but I do know that it will help stimulate the economy. But if it does not, then there will be more to come," Pelosi said.

Boehner said the agreement "was not easy for the two of us and our respective caucuses."

"You know, many Americans believe that Washington is broken," the Ohio Republican said. "But I think this agreement and I hope that this agreement will show the American people that we can fix it and will serve to move along other bipartisan agreements that we can have in the future."

Paulson said he would work with the House and Senate to enact the package as soon as possible, because "speed is of the essence." But he also cautioned that "the work is far from over."

The Treasury Department has already been talking to the IRS about getting the checks out "as quickly as possible, recognizing that the tax filing season is ongoing," said Treasury spokesman Andrew DeSouza.

The rebates would phase out gradually for individuals whose income exceeds $75,000 and couples with incomes above $150,000, aides said. Individuals with incomes up to $87,000 and couples up to $174,000 would get partial rebates. The caps are higher for those with children.

The agreement left some lawmakers in both parties with a bitter taste, and they complained that their leaders had sacrificed too much in the interest of striking a deal. Many senior Democrats were particularly upset that the package omitted the unemployment extension.

"I do not understand, and cannot accept, the resistance of President Bush and Republican leaders to including an extension of unemployment benefits for those who are without work through no fault of their own," Rep. Charles B. Rangel, D-N.Y., the Ways and Means Committee chairman, said in a statement.

Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the Finance Committee Chairman, said leaving out the unemployment extension was "a mistake," as he announced plans to craft a separate stimulus package in the Senate starting next week.

Majority Leader Harry Reid said the goal is to send the package to the White House by Feb. 15 for Bush's signature, but he noted the Senate would likely try to add more spending to the package.

"I expect that the (Finance) Committee and other senators will work to improve the House package by adding funds for other initiatives that can boost the economy immediately, such as unemployment benefits, nutrition assistance, state relief and infrastructure investment," Reid said in a statement.

Asked about this, Paulson praised Reid's leadership but said, "I don't know what he has in mind."

Bush has supported larger rebates of $800-$1,600, but his plan would have left out 30 million working households who earn paychecks but don't make enough to pay income tax, according to calculations by the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center. An additional 19 million households would receive only partial rebates under Bush's initial proposal.

To address the mortgage crisis, the package raises the limit on Federal Housing Administration loans from $362,000 to as high as $729,750 in expensive areas, allowing more subprime mortgage holders to refinance into federally insured loans. To widen the availability of mortgages across the country, it also provides a one-year boost to the cap on loans that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can buy, from $417,000 up to $729,750 in high-cost markets.

(This version CORRECTS SUBS 21st graf, bgng, To address the .. to add detail on housing package and correct numbers $729,750 sted $725,000; AP Video; editing to TRIM. Moving on general news and financial services.)



Article from http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1

[hr]


What do you think? Do you think this is a good idea?


Myself giving away money to have people spend it is really fucking stupid. If mortgage houses and credit card companies are having a hard time screw them let them fail. It serves them right for just giving loans to anyone and letting anyone get a credit card with a high limit. I remember when it was hard as hell to get a credit card now they give them away on the net in 5 mins. And you can get a loan for car in some areas without proof of employment. What type of crap is that?

So if people are dumb enough to buy too much house or acquire too much debit then oh well. Buck up and own up to your responsibility and pay it off. I have debit and I don't ask for a hand out.

But maybe I'm just a heartless human being.... or maybe I just want to see people do the right thing and quite trying to point blame for their own mistakes.


That's my .02


-D1-
User avatar
DarkOne
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2400
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:05 am
Points: 16364.23
Bank: 0 Points
Location: New Hampshire
Blog: View Blog (2)

Advertisement

Re: Tax Rebates Deal Announced In USA

Postby oceangal on Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:39 am

well let's see what happens.....
User avatar
oceangal
Senior ACC Member
Senior ACC Member
 
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:59 am
Points: 0.00
Bank: 0 Points
Location: FWB, FL


Return to General ChitChat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests